Research Article
‘The Ties That Bind’: Indonesian Female Academic Leaders’ Agency and Constraints in Higher Education
Article Metrics
Views
463
Downloads
581
Citations
Crossref
0
Arquisola . ‘the ties that bind’: indonesian female academic leaders’ agency and constraints in higher education . European J Ed Manage. 2020;3(2):37-50. doi: 10.12973/eujem.3.2.37
Arquisola, M. J. (2020). ‘the ties that bind’: indonesian female academic leaders’ agency and constraints in higher education . European Journal of Educational Management, 3(2), 37-50. https://doi.org/10.12973/eujem.3.2.37
Arquisola Maria Jacinta. "‘The Ties That Bind’: Indonesian Female Academic Leaders’ Agency and Constraints in Higher Education ," European Journal of Educational Management 3, no. 2 (2020): 37-50. https://doi.org/10.12973/eujem.3.2.37
Arquisola, M 2020, '‘the ties that bind’: indonesian female academic leaders’ agency and constraints in higher education ', European Journal of Educational Management, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 37-50. Arquisola, Maria Jacinta. "‘The Ties That Bind’: Indonesian Female Academic Leaders’ Agency and Constraints in Higher Education." European Journal of Educational Management, vol. 3, no. 2, 2020, pp. 37-50, https://doi.org/10.12973/eujem.3.2.37.
Abstract
Indonesia has achieved equal parity in access to education, income, and career opportunities. Yet in many parts of the country, female academic leaders are still highly under-represented in top academic boards. This study examines how fourteen (14) Indonesian female higher education academic leaders (FALs) enact identity salience and agency in performing their duties, while experiencing social control schemas or ‘triple binds’—exigencies of gender roles, unequal power-plays due to social status and positions, and lack of organizational resources and capital in higher education—in Indonesia, one of the world’s emerging economies still consolidating democracy and building necessary social, fiscal, and physical infrastructures. Taken as a whole, the study found the ‘triple binds’ as aggregate constraints for female leadership progression, driving female academic leaders to resist and rise above this discursive struggle and confrontation through sense-making, assertiveness, depth of conviction, a take-charge attitude, and the use of other tactical strategies like networking with key gatekeepers to obtain the resources they need. The study presents a framework of the triple binds that university leaders can use to assess constraints to academic leadership.
Keywords: Academic leadership, gender, constraints, sense-making, Indonesia.
References
Ahmad, S., Fazal-E-Hasan, S. M., & Kaleem, A. (2018). How ethical leadership stimulates academics’ retention in universities: The mediating role of job-related affective well-being. International Journal of Educational Management, 32(7), 1348-1362. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-11-2017-0324
Airini, C. S., Conner, L., McPherson, K., Midson, B., & Wilson, C. (2011). Learning to be leaders in higher education: What helps or hinders women's advancement as leaders in universities. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 39(1), 44-62.
Alvesson, M., & Deetz, S. (2000). Doing critical management research. Sage.
Arimbi, D. A. (2010). Reading contemporary Indonesian Muslim women writers: Representation, identity and religion of Muslim women in Indonesian fiction. Amsterdam University Press.
Arquisola, M.J., Zutshi, A., Rentschler, R., & Billsberry, J. (2020). Academic leaders’ double bind: Challenges from an Indonesian perspective. International Journal of Educational Management, 34(2), 397-416.
Atwell, A. (2006). Designing an Indonesian leadership training program: Reflections upon decisions made. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 1, 11-19.
Australian Agency for International Development. (2010). A strategic assessment of the higher education sector in Indonesia. AUSAID and Strategic Asia.
Azmi, L. A. G, Ismail, S. H. S., & Basir, S. A. (2012). Women career advancement in public service: A study in Indonesia. Procedia- Social and Behavioural Sciences, 58, 298-306.
Bai, Y., Li, P. P., & Xi, Y. (2012). The distinctive effects of dual-level leadership behaviours on employees’ trust in leadership: An empirical study from China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 29(2), 213-237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-011-9280-6
Basu, S. (2008). Gender stereotypes in corporate India: A glimpse. Sage.
Central Bureau of Statistics Indonesia. (2011). National labor force survey. Central Bureau of Statistics Indonesia Publications.
Benschop, Y., & Dooreward, H. (1998). Covered by equality: The gender subtext of organizations. Organization Studies, 19(5), 787-805. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069801900504
Blackmore, J. (2002). Troubling women: The upsides and downsides of leadership and the new managerialism. In C. Reynolds (Ed.). Women in school leadership: International perspectives (pp. 49-69). State University of New York Press.
Brinkman, S., & Kvale, S. (2005). Confronting the ethics of qualitative research. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 18(2), 157-181.
Chen, C. C., Ünal, A. F., Leung, K., & Xin, K. R. (2016). Group harmony in the workplace: Conception, measurement, and validation. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 33(4), 903-934.
Coleman, M. (2007). Gender and educational leadership in England: A comparison of secondary head-teachers' views over time. School Leadership and Management, 27(4), 383-399.
Collard, J. (2007). Constructing theory for leadership in intercultural contexts. Journal of Educational Administration, 45(6), 740-755.
Cubillo, L., & Brown, M. (2003). Women into educational leadership and management: International differences. Journal of Educational Administration, 41(3), 278-291.
Degn, L. (2014). Identity constructions and sensemaking in higher education: A case study of Danish higher education department heads. Studies in Higher Education, 40(7), 1179-1193. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.881345
Degn, L. (2018). Academic sensemaking and behavioural responses – exploring how academics perceive and respond to identity threats in times of turmoil. Studies in Higher Education, 43(2), 305-321.
Directorate General of Higher Education. (2013). Higher education data base. Directorate General of Higher Education. https://forlap.dikti.go.id
Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109(3), 573-598.
Elliott, C., & Stead, V. (2008). Learning from leading women's experience: Towards a sociological understanding. Leadership, 4(2), 159-180.
Ely, R. J., Ibarra, H., & Kolb, D. M. (2011). Taking gender into account: Theory and design for women's leadership development programs. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 10(3), 474-493.
Fitzsimmons, T. W., Callan, V. J., & Paulsen, N. (2013). Gender parity in the C-suite: Do male and female CEOs differ in how they reached the top? The Leadership Quarterly, 25(2), 246-266.
Fletcher, J. K. (2004). The paradox of post-heroic leadership: An essay on gender, power, and transformational change. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(5), 647-661.
Floyd, S., & Lane, P. (2000). Strategizing throughout the organisation: Managing role conflict in strategic renewal. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 154-177.
Floyd, S. W., & Wooldridge, B. (2000). Building strategy from the middle. Sage.
Gallant, A. (2014). Symbolic interactions and the development of women leaders in higher education. Gender, Work, and Organization, 21(3), 203- 216.
Gaus, N. (2011). Women and school leadership: Factors deterring female teachers from holding principal positions at elementary schools in Makassar. Advancing Women in Leadership, 31, 175-188.
Gregory-Mina, H. J. (2012). Gender barriers of women striving for a corporate officer position: A literature review. Advancing Women in Leadership, 32, 54-78. http://advancingwomen.com/aw1/aw1_wordpress/
Gillies, D. (2013). Educational leadership and Michel Foucault. Routledge.
Hallinger, P. (2011). Leadership for learning: Lessons from 40 years of empirical research. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(2), 125-142.
Heilman, M. E. (2001). Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women’s ascent up the organizational ladder. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 657-674.
Heilman, M. E. (2012). Gender stereotypes and workplace bias. Research in Organizational Behaviour, 32, 113-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2012.11.003
Heilman, M. E., & Okimoto, T. G. (2007). Why are women penalized for success at male tasks? The implied communality deficit. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 81-92. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.81
Hill, H., & Thee, K. W. (2012). Indonesian universities in transition: Catching up and opening up. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 48(2), 229-251.
Higginbottom, K., & Robinson, K. (2019). The critical importance of support systems for women educational CEOs. European Journal of Educational Management, 2(2), 59-72. https://doi.org/10.12973/eujem.2.2.59
Hirschman, C. (2016). Gender, the status of women, and family structure in Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Economic Studies, 53(1), 33-50.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Sage.
Horak, S., & Taube, M. (2016). Same but different? Similarities and fundamental differences of informal social networks in China (guanxi) and Korea (yongo). Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 33(3), 595-616.
House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (2004). Culture, leadership, and organisations: The Globe study of 62 Societies. Sage.
Jogulu, U., & Ferkins, L. (2012). Leadership and culture in Asia: The case of Malaysia. Asia Pacific Business Review, 18(4), 531-549.
Jones, G. (2011). Academic leadership and departmental headship in turbulent times. Tertiary Education and Management, 17(4), 279-288.
Kan, M. M., & Parry, K. (2004). Identifying paradox: A grounded theory of leadership in overcoming resistance to change. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(4), 467-491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.05.003
Karelaia, N., & Guillen, L. (2012). Me, a woman and a leader: Antecedents and consequences of the identity conflict of women leaders (INSEAD Working Paper No. 2012/117/DS). SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1973017
Kaufman, E. K., & Grace, P. E. (2011). Women in grassroots leadership: Barriers and biases experienced in a membership organisation dominated by men. Journal of Leadership Studies, 4(4), 6-16. https://doi.org/10.1002/jls.20188
Kelemen, M., & Rumens, N. (2008). An introduction to critical management research. Sage.
Kempster, S., & Parry, K. (2011). Grounded theory and leadership research: A critical realist perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(1), 106-120.
Kull, A. (2009). At the forefront of a post-patriarchal Islamic education: Female teachers in Indonesia. Journal of International Women's Studies, 11(1), 25-39.
Leibowitz, B., Bozalek, V., van Schalkwyk, S., & Winberg, C. (2015). Institutional context matters: The professional development of academics as teachers in South African higher education. Higher Education, 69(2), 315-330.
Mantere, S. (2008). Role expectations and middle manager strategic agency. Journal of Management Studies, 52(2), 294-316.
Maranto, C., & Griffin, A. E. (2010). The antecedents of a 'chilly climate' for women faculty in higher education. Human Relations, 64(2), 139-159.
Martin, P. Y. (2003). "Said and done" versus "Saying and doing": Gendering practices, practicing gender at work. Gender and Society, 17(3), 342-366.
Mueller, R. A. (2014). A general model of organizational values in educational administration. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 42(5), 640-656.
Mulder, N. (1996). Inside Indonesian society, culture change in Java. The Pepin Press.
Murniati, C. T. (2012). Career advancement of women senior academic administrators in Indonesia: Supports and challenges. University of Iowa.
Newton, P., Burgess, D., & Burns, D. P. (2010). Models in educational administration: Revisiting Willower’s ‘theoretically oriented’ critique. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 38(5), 578-590.
Nizam. (2006). Indonesia: The need for higher education reform. In Higher Education in South East Asia (pp. 35-68). UNESCO Asia and Pacific Regional Bureau for Education.
Nurmila, N. (2013). Indonesian Muslim's discourse of husband-wife relationship. Al-Jamiah: Journal of Islamic Studies, 51(1), 61-80.
Overseas Economic Cooperation and Development & Asian Development Bank. (2015). Education in Indonesia: Rising to the challenge. OECD Publishing.
Omar, A., & Davidson, M. J. (2001). Women in management: A comparative cross-cultural overview. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 8(3/4), 35-97. https://doi.org/10.1108/13527600110797272
Parry, K. (2008). The thing about metaphors and leadership. International Leadership Journal, 1(1), 6-23.
Petriglieri, J. L. (2011). Under threat: Responses to and consequences of threats to individuals' identities. Academy of Management Review, 36(4), 641-662.
Qian, H., Han, J., & Niu, X. (2009). Chinese women's participation in educational leadership: A review and analysis of the current situation. In H. Sobehart (Ed.), Women leading education across the continents. Rowman & Littlefied Education.
Robinson, K. (2009). Gender, Islam, and democracy in Indonesia. Taylor & Francis.
Sadri, G., Weber, T. J., & Gentry, W. A. (2011). Empathic emotion and leadership performance: An empirical analysis across 38 countries. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(5), 818-830.
Sakariyau, R., & Zakuan, U.A.A. (2017). Gender inequality and the challenges of human development: the Nigerian and Malaysian experience, The Journal of Globalization and Development, 13(1), 65-82.
Sandberg, J., & Tsoukas, H. (2014). Making sense of the sensemaking perspective: Its constituents, limitations, and opportunities for further development. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(S1), 6-32. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1937
Sarros, J., Gray, J., Densen, I., Parry, K., Hartican, A., & Cooper, B. (2005). The Australian Business Leadership Survey #3: Leadership, organizational culture, and innovation of Australian enterprises. Monash University.
Schendel, R, & McCowan, T. (2016). Expanding higher education systems in low-and middle-income countries: the challenges of equity and quality. Higher Education, 72, 407-411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0028-6
Shah, S. 2006. Educational leadership: An Islamic perspective. British Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 363-385.
Shah, S. (2010). Re-thinking educational leadership: Exploring the impact of cultural and belief systems. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 13(1), 27-44.
Smith-Hefner, N. (2009). Language shift, gender, and ideologies of modernity in Central Java, Indonesia. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 19(1), 57-77.
Srimulyani, E. (2007). Muslim women and education in Indonesia: The “pondok pesantren” experience. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 27(1), 85-99.
Srimulyani, E. (2008). Pesantren Seblak (Boarding School) of Jombang, East Java: Women’s educational leadership. Review of Indonesian and Malaysian Affairs, 42(1), 81-106.
Stets, J. E., & Burke, P. J. (2000). Identity theory and social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63(3), 224-237.
Suryadarma, D. (2012). How corruption diminishes the effectiveness of public spending on education in Indonesia. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 48(1), 85-100.
Mulya, T.W, & Sakhiyya, M. (2020). ‘Leadership is a sacred matter’: Women leaders contesting and contextualising neoliberal meritocracy in the Indonesian academia. Gender and Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2020.1802407
Tjahjono, H. K., & Palupi, M. (2010). The challenge of Indonesian female managers in business sector toward global business competition. Muhammadiyah University of Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Tjosvold, D., & Sun, H. F. (2002). Understanding conflict avoidance: Relationship, motivations, actions and consequences. The International Journal of Conflict Management, 13(2), 142-164.
United Nations Educational and Scientific Organization. (2011). World data on education - Indonesia. UNESCO.
United Nations Educational and Scientific Organization. (2014). Higher education in Asia: Expanding out, expanding up. UNESCO Institute for Statistics. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000227516
United States Agency for International Development. (2015). Launching of women's leadership network of Indonesian higher education. Higher Education Leadership and Management (HELM).
Vogel, L., & Alsliman, A. (2018). Being a Saudi and Qatari female principal: Position demands, challenges, and advice. European Journal of Educational Management, 2(1), 13-33. https://doi.org/10.12973/eujem.2.1.13
Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Sage.
Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16(4), 409-421.
White, S. (2002). Rigor and Relevance in Asian Management Research: Where are we and where can we go? Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19(2-3), 287-352.
World Bank. (2014). Tertiary education in Indonesia: Directions for policy. World Bank Group.
Young, M. D. (2005). Shifting away from women's issues in educational leadership in the US: Evidence of a backlash? International Studies in Educational Administration, 33(2), 31-42.
Yukl, G., & Becker, W.S. (2006). Effective empowerment in organisations. Organisation Management Journal, 3(3), 210-231.
Yukongdi, V., & Benson, J. (2005). Women in Asian management: Cracking the glass ceiling? Asia Pacific Business Review, 11(2), 139-148.
Zhu, Y., Konrad, A. M., & Jiao, H. (2016). Violation and activation of gender expectations: Do Chinese managerial women face a narrow band of acceptable career Guanxi strategies? Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 33(1), 53-86.
