Research Article
Freedom to Choose within Limits: Teacher Autonomy from the Perspectives of Basic School Teachers in Ghana
Dandy George Dampson , Stephen Kwakye Apau, Uriel Amuah
Article Metrics
Views
662
Downloads
1000
Citations
Crossref
0
Dampson DG, Apau SK, Amuah U. Freedom to choose within limits: teacher autonomy from the perspectives of basic school teachers in ghana. European J Ed Manage. 2016;2(1):35-44. doi: 10.12973/eujem.2.1.35
Dampson, D. G., Apau, S. K., & Amuah, U. (2016). Freedom to choose within limits: teacher autonomy from the perspectives of basic school teachers in ghana. European Journal of Educational Management, 2(1), 35-44. https://doi.org/10.12973/eujem.2.1.35
Dampson Dandy George, Stephen Kwakye Apau, and Uriel Amuah. "Freedom to Choose within Limits: Teacher Autonomy from the Perspectives of Basic School Teachers in Ghana," European Journal of Educational Management 2, no. 1 (2016): 35-44. https://doi.org/10.12973/eujem.2.1.35
Dampson, DG Apau, SK & Amuah, 2016, 'Freedom to choose within limits: teacher autonomy from the perspectives of basic school teachers in ghana', European Journal of Educational Management, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 35-44. Dampson, Dandy George et al. "Freedom to Choose within Limits: Teacher Autonomy from the Perspectives of Basic School Teachers in Ghana." European Journal of Educational Management, vol. 2, no. 1, 2016, pp. 35-44, https://doi.org/10.12973/eujem.2.1.35.
Abstract
The study examined the level of autonomy among basic school teachers in the Central Region of Ghana and the effect of teacher demographic characteristics on the level of teacher autonomy. The explanatory sequential design was adopted. Using the systematic sampling technique, a total of 315 basic school teachers were sampled for the quantitative phase of the study whilst 12 teachers were sampled for the qualitative phase through the purposive sampling technique. Eighteen (18) items Likert-scale was adapted from Pearson and Hall and used for the quantitative phase. A semi-structured interview guide was designed to collect data to further elaborate the study’s key findings. Both descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyse the quantitative data whilst the interview was analysed thematically. The study revealed that teachers in the Central Region of Ghana hold positive perceptions about their autonomy with the level of autonomy being moderate. It further established that teacher autonomy is affected by gender positively whilst age and teaching experience affects their level of autonomy negatively. Based on the findings, it is recommended that the Ghana Education Service (GES) and school heads should organize in-service programmes aimed at informing basic school teachers on the extent of autonomy that they have in the process of implementing the curriculum.
Keywords: Autonomy, curriculum, teaching experience.
References
Adu-Agyem, J., & Osei-Poku, P. (2012). Quality education in Ghana: The way forward. International Journal of Innovative Research and Development, 1(9), 164-177.
Amabile, T. M., DeJong, W., & Lepper, M. R. (1976). Effects of externally imposed deadlines on subsequent intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34(1), 92-98.
Anderson, L. W. (1987). The decline of teacher autonomy: Tears or cheers? International Review of Education, 33(3), 357-373.
Archbald, D. A., & Porter, A. C. (1994). Curriculum control and teachers' perceptions of autonomy and satisfaction. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 16(1), 21-39.
Chapman, D., Barcikowski, E., Sowah, M., & Gyamera, E. (2002). Do communities know best? Testing a premise of educational decentralisation: community members’ perception of their local schools in Ghana. International Journal of Educational Development, 22(2), 181–189.
Deci, E. L. (1971). Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. Journal of personality and Social Psychology, 18(1), 105.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2012). Motivation, personality, and development within embedded social contexts: An overview of self-determination theory. In R. M. Ryan (Ed.), Oxford handbook of human motivation (pp. 85-107). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Errs, M. (2018). Complete freedom to choose within limits: Teachers views of curricular autonomy, autonomy, agency and control in Estonia, Finland and Germany. The Curriculum Journal, 29(2), 238-256.
Erss, M., Kalmus, V., & Autio, T. H. (2016). ‘Walking a fine line’: Teachers’ perception of curricular autonomy in Estonia, Finland and Germany. Journal of curriculum studies, 48(5), 589-609.
Erss, M., Kalmus, V., & Aution, H. (2016). ‘Walking a fine line’: Teachers’ perception of curricular autonomy in Estonia, Finland and Germany. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 48(5), 589-609.
Friedman, I. A. (1999). Teacher-perceived work autonomy: The concept and its measurement. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59(1), 58-76.
Genc, Z. S. (2010). Teacher autonomy through reflective journals among teachers of English as a foreign language in Turkey. Teacher Development, 14(3), 397-409.
Government of Ghana (GOG) (1986). Committee report on junior secondary school education. Accra, Ghana: Government Printing Press.
Hong, W., & Youngs, P. (2016). Why are teachers afraid of curricular autonomy? Contradictory effects of the new national curriculum in South Korea. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 36(S1), 20-33.
Hyslop-Margison, E. J., & Sears, A. M. (2010). Enhancing teacher performance: The role of professional autonomy. Interchange, 41(1), 1-15.
Ingersoll, R. M. (1997). The status of teaching as a profession: 1990–1991 (NCES 97–104). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Centre for Education Statistics.
Jackson, P. W. (1990). Life in classrooms (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Johnson, S. M. (1990). Teachers at work. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Juntunen, M. L. (2017). National assessment meets teacher autonomy: national assessment of learning outcomes in music in Finnish basic education. Music Education Research, 19(1), 1-16.
Kauffman, D. (2005). Curriculum prescription and curriculum constraint: Second-year teachers ’perceptions. NGT Working Paper. Cambridge, MA: Project on the Next Generation of Teachers. Retrieved from https://projectngt.gse.harvard.edu/files/gse-projectngt/files/prescription_constraint.pdf
Kumaravadivelu, B. (2001). Toward a postmethod pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly, 35(4), 537–60.
LaCoe, C. S. (2006). Decomposing teacher autonomy: A study investigating types of teacher autonomy and how current public-school climate affects teacher autonomy (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, USA.
Lundstrom, U. (2015). Teacher autonomy in the era of New Public Management. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 2015(2), 73-82. https://doi.org/10.3402/nstep.v1.28144
Mankoe, J. O. (1992). Perceived problems and benefits of a decentralised elementary educational system in Ghana (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Mfum-Mensah, O. (2004). Empowerment or impairment? Involving traditional communities in school management. International Review of Education, 50(2), 141–155.4
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Osei, G. M. & Brock, C. (2006). Decentralisation in education, institutional culture and teacher autonomy in Ghana. Journal of Education Policy, 21(4), 437-458
Pearson, L. C., & Hall, B. W. (1993). Initial construct validation of the teaching autonomy scale. The Journal of Educational Research, 86(3), 172-178.
Pearson, L. C., & Moomaw, W. (2005). The relationship between teacher autonomy and stress, work satisfaction, empowerment, and professionalism. Educational research quarterly, 29(1), 38-54.
Perryman, J., Ball, S., Maguire, M., & Braun, A. (2011). Life in the pressure cooker-school league tables and English and mathematics teachers’ responses to accountability in a results-driven era. British Journal of Educational Studies, 59(2), 179–195.
Prichard, C., & Moore, J. E. (2016). Variables influencing teacher autonomy, administrative coordination, and collaboration. Journal of Educational Administration, 54(1), 58-74.
Ramatlapana, K., & Makonye, J. P. (2012). From too much freedom to too much restriction: The case of teacher autonomy from National Curriculum Statement (NCS) to Curriculum and Assessment Statement (CAPS). Africa Education Review, 9(sup1), S7-S25.
Robertson, L., & Jones, M. G. (2013). Chinese and US middle-school science teachers’ autonomy, motivation, and instructional practices. International Journal of Science Education, 35(9), 1454–1489.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. New York, NY: Guilford Publishing.
Salokangas, M., & Wermke, W. (2016, August). What do we know about teacher autonomy? A review of international literature. Paper presented at the ECER 2016 Leading Education: The Distinct Contributions of Educational Research and Researchers. University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Skilbeck, M. (2005). School-based curriculum development. In A. Lieberman (Ed.), The roots of educational change (pp. 109–132). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Skinner, R. (2008). Autonomy, working conditions, and teacher satisfaction: Does the public charter school bargain make a difference? (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
Steh, B., & Pozarnik B. M. (2005). Teachers’ perception of their professional autonomy in the environment of systemic change. In Beijaard, Douwe, (Ed.), Teacher professional development in changing conditions (pp. 349-363). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Strong, L. E. G., & Yoshida, R. K. (2014). Teachers’ autonomy in today’s educational climate: Current perceptions from an acceptable instrument. Educational Studies, 50(2), 123-145.
Tuul, M., Mikser, R., Neudorf, E., & Ugaste, A. (2015). Estonian preschool teachers’ aspirations for curricular autonomy – the gap between an ideal and professional practice. Early Child Development and Care, 185(11-12), 1845-1861.
Vieira, F. (2007). Teacher autonomy: Why should we care? Independence, 41, 20-28.
Wright, J. L. (2018). A multiple-case study on the perceptions of teacher autonomy in a traditionally structured and a teacher powered school (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Liberty University, VA, USA.
